|
Will You Repeat Your Programming As Temporary Caretakers on The Land, Building Your Temporary Dream Life, Or Will You Instead Create Something On Your Land For Eternity? |
|
Table of Contents1. How do I become a full voting member of Colorado Kin's Domains planning group? That process is always subject to change as need arises. At present with our new system, there are three steps.
Keep in mind that there are two organizations here. Colorado Kin Domains is a funding organization and a planning group for Ark Conservation Ranch which is the working name of the settlement we are planning. Joining our current planning group will not be the same steps as joining the Ark Conservation Ranch Settlement. Those steps have not yet been defined. Back to Top
2. How do I become a resident of your settlement? Our Intake process is currently being developed and will be posted here when complete. We do not yet have land but will definitely have the intake process in place for your review before land is purchased. Back to Top
3. Where can I find the Ringing Cedars Books and Products? Books in English are available at www.ringingcedars.com and official products are available at www.ringingcedarsofrussia.org Back to Top
4. What other things are going on around the world about this series? There are many things you can read about and get involved in. Each of the following links will have many other links.
Back to Top
5. What is it about the John Heitzman model that you resonate with? "Our group read of the Billionaire story and discussed it's different aspects in an effort to feel into your course correction and reference to John Heitzman. I am curious as to what parts of the story of John Heitzman do you most relate to and which parts touch and inspire you the most? I addressed the John Heitzman question in the course correction notes but let me see if I can be more clear about it here. I’m not sure that one part or another of the story touches me the most. It’s very instructive all through and very inspiring. I understood layer upon layer of valuable information and instruction.
In our group, the dysfunction was already in motion at the very first official meeting when the other four attending each said they wanted to create an “intentional community” and described what that meant to them. I was the last to speak my thoughts and I said I was not interested in creating “community,” as they had described it because I had seen and been part of those kinds of communities and they don’t work and certainly aren't sustainable energetically. I said that I only wanted to create kin’s domains for my family with a settlement or village of other kin’s domains around us where community would form spontaneously and organically by those drawn to it. I
asked if they felt we could work together from that position.
They all thought we could. In that decision they began
giving up elements of their dream as I held mine secure. From that meeting on, there was a continuously increasing effort to get as much of each person’s dream into the plan as possible. By not seeing a reason for sharing my full originating vision, I had inadvertently created an impossible picture (M.C. Escher draws fascinating pictures that cannot be duplicated in physical reality http://www.mcescher.com/). We all assumed we shared “Anastasia’s Vision” but our different
versions of that were being diminished and compromised at every meeting. Each
person was aware of his own loss but unaware of the loss we were each inadvertently
trying to create for others. In our culture we collectively believe that a person like John Heitzman is greedy, controlling, selfish and self-centered because they create THEIR dreams without taking responsibility for the dreams of others. In the story everyone finally accepted him as okay when they learned that his dream was founded on Love, and they stopped withholding their love from him at that point. The thing about
that, is that we do the same thing to ourselves and everyone else.
We unconsciously deny our right, and in fact our responsibility, to create
our own heaven on earth, by unconsciously saying that we have to compromise it so as to please
others. That’s about fear, not
love. It’s about avoiding
judgment and finger pointing. It’s
about staying within the cultural lines of “acceptable.”
It’s about creating the denial of heaven on earth.
In fact it cannot create Heaven on Earth because it's founded in denial of love and
fulfillment. I think the American Story was included in the books for a very big reason. We (Americans) are the most enslaved people on the planet. We are enslaved by ourselves but we blame the John Heitzmans. We teach ourselves and each other that it’s bad to honor our own dreams and take responsibility to create them, because we think we should be taking care of everyone else – which is impossible and therefore everyone loses. Our school systems, court systems, corporate systems and government systems are all teaching and enforcing our collective support of self-denial (love-denial). We teach and demand “nice or loving behaviors” that disguise very harsh self-judgment and even self-hatred feelings. Self judgment will always manifest as other-judgment. In the story John Heitzman was the richest man in the world. That is the perfect symbol of our collective self-judgment and self-denial. That symbol holds all the unconscious self hatred and denial of love and fulfillment that we collectively hold. We freely and unconsciously feed the John Heitzmans with our money because we freely and unconsciously deny ourselves love and fulfillment. In the story even that was present. John was recipient of the people's money as well as the recipient of the people's denial of love and fulfillment. BUT HE turned it around on his own by
allowing HIS OWN love into his mind and awareness. He then set about to
do what he'd always done - fulfilled HIS dream, except this time the dream was
about conscious love, HIS heaven on earth. Every time I read the
story I love it more and I learn more. I apologize for writing so much about this question but even with all of that there's still so much more that I’ve learned from the billionaire story. There are entire other levels that touch other huge parts of American life (my life) that aren’t about our Colorado Kin’s Domains Groups. Back to Top
6. What is the Holacracy Model and how does it work in your group? I downloaded and printed the holacracy white pages (www.holacracy.org). I am gathering a feeling for the concept and would like to become more clear. Would you help me understand what it looks and sounds like when you say "We used the holacracy format?" Keep
in mind that we’ve only read two papers (33 and 49 pages) and two shorter
articles (10 pages and 7 pages). We’ve
had no official training yet but are diligent in applying what we’ve read
about to the best of our ability. In our
first two Holacracy style meetings
we’ve applied the model in this way:
The key in that tension resolving process and making rapid decisions is that we keep each other in line with our three main Holacracy keys and the initiating vision that we all accepted:
In
the first meeting we encountered about four or five tension points. The
resolution process mentioned above quickly brought up an acceptable (to
everyone) next step or solution. In
the second meeting using this practice we didn’t have any tensions arising that weren’t easily
resolved before needing to do the resolution process. That
was probably because of the nature of our agenda items in that meeting. Here are our results after two meetings using this practice:
We’ve
also noticed that as we begin discussing one agenda point, the others
organically fall into place. For
example, at our first meeting using Holacracy we had on the agenda, to come up
with an organizational structure that people could put themselves into as they
join us. As we discussed our vision
points, the organizational structure formed spontaneously.
When we finished the vision we discovered we’d also finished the
organizational structure effortlessly and simultaneously.
The second meeting was similar. As we
discussed the problems with other settlements around the world, we came up with
a plan to ease the transition process to our village, AND simultaneously most of
the Plan emerged that we will present to the county and grant foundations,
complete with substantial value to them to justify them granting us the
variances (or money) we need. That
Plan was another agenda item that spontaneously created most of itself AND it is
far more expansive and exciting than any of us imagined we could achieve so
quickly and easily. Another unexpected benefit of the Holacracy model is that so far we have been able to involve new members far easier, faster and without the need for so much catch-up. (That’s probably also partly because of the filter of the initiating vision.) We’ve had two guests/members who had not done any of the catch up process and one of them hadn’t even read past book four yet. Because of the structure of the meetings it was smooth easy and valuable to include them in the meeting and even the decision making process. In our past meetings new members were so difficult to integrate that it nearly stopped all forward progress until they got up to speed. Our new organizational map
(Holacratic style) also makes it easy for a
new person to see where they might best fit in smoothly and quickly. I am loving the organic flow that this model allows. I’m loving the reduction or even absence of ego that this model supports. I’m loving the results with NO negatives or negative energy encountered so far. Okay, there is one negative. We’re
covering so much ground each meeting that I’m VERY busy between meetings
getting it all implemented. The
meetings are now moving faster than I can (which is FAST).
However, we dropped back to meeting every other week again because we no
longer need weekly meetings just to get a tiny bit of decision making completed,
as was happening before this change. Back to Top
All meetings are posted on the schedule page. Back to Top
8. Who will own title to the Kin's domain land? " Will each person own the title to his or her own domain? I am only asking because I imagine there will be quite a lot of time, effort and love put into one's domain. I met an older man at the Twin Oaks Conference, and he told me that when the husband who owned the land that his community was on, died (the husband and wife were part of the community), the son talked the wife (the son's stepmother) into selling the land - so everyone in the community had to move off of the land. He (the man at Twin Oaks) is now older, with health problems, and lives in a small room in Washington, D.C. I don't remember this being addressed in the books. I had the impression that each person owned his/her own land, but I may have been mistaken.” Answer: It is necessary to explain a bit about land and real estate to fully answer this question. Land is an energy defined as occupying a specific space (legal description of the land identifies the space within which the "land" is located). By law, land cannot be bought or sold, only transferred (granted). Real Estate, however, is NOT the land. It is everything appurtenant to the land that can be removed such as buildings, trees, plants, rocks, dirt, critters, etc. Real Estate can be bought and sold. In our settlement we are following the model in the Billionaire Story (beginning on page 78, Book 8.1) as closely as we can. In that story the parcels of land, trees, seeds and a house were given for lifetime use as long as they (or their heirs) lived there. The land in that story was given in exchange for a signed agreement defining what was expected of the residents. We also intend to give the land to each family, in the form of a land patent defined by the perimeter of their domain (also in exchange for an agreement)-. Land on which the patent is brought forward in the name of the current owner cannot be taken from the land owner for any claim including debt or taxes. Land Patent is the highest form of title in this country and has NEVER been reversed in a court of law. So, that puts land ownership in the full control of the domain family (individual). What about the Real Estate? Most people think of Real Estate as land but it is not. Very little of the land patents in this country have been brought forward into the Real Estate owner's name. We have come to collectively value the Real Estate more than the land (Man's creation is commonly more valued than the Earth). Therefore people buy and sell Real Estate without giving any thought to the actual land other than as a platform for the real estate. We buy our Real Estate based on how well it appeals to us. The previous owner can "make money" by improving on the real estate to make it more attractive (improving resources like houses, landscaping, water, minerals). We, at Colorado Kin Domains, think it is very risky for a kin’s domain settlement, at least in this country at this time, to put ownership of the Real Estate into private control of the domain owner because legally, what is bought can be sold at will (whether real estate or organizational memberships). Of course covenant controls and purchasing agreements can mitigate some of that but they are limited in the degree of protection for the community that they can provide, and they attract a lot of litigation. There are a few other problems that come up with selling the domain's real estate, but by placing the real estate in a trust or a foundation, with full use and stewardship rights given to each owner (and their heirs) of the domain land, the stability of the community can be set in stone, so to speak far beyond the lifetime of any individual - into perpetuity, in fact. Land patents are granted into perpetuity (forever) and the trust that technically owns and grants the use and stewardship of the real estate, is also a perpetual entity, potentially living far beyond the lifetime of any individual. Back to Top
9. Can single people settle on one of your kin's domains?
Singles are absolutely welcome to settle with us at Ark
Conservation Ranch. We expect to have many singles join us from very young
to older.
10.
Is the settlement that your group is planning going to be funded by an individual
that will give the families a domain if they meet the criteria? Our
planned settlement will be funded by a donor (either individual or
organization). At present it appears that it will be a combination of an
individual donor (already identified) and a grant foundation donor. Our
first grant proposal is currently being reviewed (March, 2009) and has very good
chance of being funded by early May. Among many other projects, our grant
funds will purchase land, infrastructure and provide building materials for a
sustainable home for each domain. The families who wish to live on our
settlement will receive their domain in exchange for a signed agreement (as was
done in the billionaire story). The only criteria they have to meet is
that they are willing to accept and sign the agreement. You can read more
about this decision on our website at either the course correction page
http://www.coloradokindomains.com/Documents/course_correction.htm
or the FAQ page http://www.coloradokindomains.com/F.A.Q..htm In
addition, it is our plan to offer the SAME option to all future settlements in
North America if they wish to participate in the Network portion of the Plan.
We are initiating a self-renewing self-regenerating fund that each
settlement will be responsible for if they participate with this growth network
(with full instruction and support). In exchange for helping us develop,
test and refine this funding model, two other settlements besides Ark
Conservation Ranch will receive funding for purchasing and building their
settlement. Other settlements that receive funding are not obligated to
give their kin’s domains and a house for free but they will be able to do so.
(I imagine most will want to). The plan we are testing can make it
possible for each settlement that participates, to fund a new settlement every
three to five years. It is an amazing plan that will make it possible for
kin’s domain settlements to mushroom all over North America and beyond very
quickly.
11. I was
wondering about your founding Vision. I was wondering why you do not have
Anastasia's dream in it? Actually you do have it in there just not her exact
words: "To Recreate Paradise on Earth." At present, I favor the public presentation that “we are creating an infinitely sustainable lifestyle” rather than “we are creating a Ringing Cedars Settlement.” I think it communicates to those who haven't read the series what we are doing in a way that does not exclude those who are aligned with our mission but haven't read the same books many of us have read. Since the size of our project necessarily involves non-readers in building the dream (as the billionaire story did) I think “infinitely sustainable lifestyle” serves us well in quickly getting everyone on the same page. We may get to that infinitely sustainable goal in stages but infinite sustainability is intrinsic to Anastasia’s dream. The terms “green” and “sustainable” have very quickly gotten watered down and popularized in such a way that they no longer have any real meaning toward creating a sustainable future. In fact they allow people to believe they are contributing to sustainable lifestyles while remaining unconscious of the fact that they are really holding on to and supporting an Unsustainable lifestyle. Those terms and the movement have created some products and practices that are perhaps a better version of unsustainable living, but they are not infinitely sustainable and therefore cannot yet contribute directly to creating Anastasia’s “Paradise on Earth.” It is my dream that “infinite sustainability” will move us collectively past that fear barrier that keeps us attached to our unsustainable modern lifestyle. We have a very long way to go. Back to Top
12. Explain the unsustainable lifestyle that Americans are living out of? Answer:
First let me begin with a definition of Infinitely sustainable living.
We define that as living in such a manner that within the defined area,
all resources are stewarded such that they are used at a slower rate than the
rate at which they can be naturally replenished, the enclosed system can
continue indefinitely growing its internal resource base while supporting the
standard of living of people and the flora and fauna within the space.
The sustainable life-style is therefore independent of external
non-sustainable ecosystems.
As individuals are able to personally commit time and energy resources to
creating and living an infinitely sustainable lifestyle, the consumer/depletion
life-style will be replaced with a lifestyle that is sustainable into
perpetuity.
The current average American lifestyle is based on a consumer/depletion
approach to living. This is evident in various aspects of life. A major example is Food. The
majority of food is produced on agribusiness size farms. For this food to be
produced, many depletion measures are routinely employed. To start with, the
ecology that was present in the area prior to it becoming a field of the desired
crop has been destroyed in order to create an open field. Some of the animal
life was destroyed, some of it misplaced. Much of the fauna was destroyed
including the critical microorganisms that create a balance for the soil to
produce exactly what is appropriate to grow in that particular local ecology. Creating
a crop field requires machinery and fossil fuels, creates air pollution, soil
compaction, and sound pollution. Once the field is cleared, soil amendments must
be applied to counteract some of the destruction. Then the field is planted with
machinery using fossil fuels and mined resources for the machinery. Complex
irrigation systems are created in order to bring far more water to the field
than is required for it’s natural habitat and balance. The new crops are
tended, throughout their growing process, by multiple laborers who are generally
employees. They require insurance
and the complement of employee care. The crops are harvested, either by multiple
laborers or by machinery or both. They
are then shipped to a manufacturing or packaging site and prepped for sale by
more labor or machines, then packaged, and shipped an average of 1500 miles (but
often to the opposite side of the planet) from where the food was grown.
It is then housed in a grocery store to be picked up by a consumer who
must use (deplete) a substantial amount of the same planetary resources to go
purchase the food. Most of this
process applies to organic food as well as mainstream food. These systems require that we have roadways that are frequently repaired, that can handle high and heavy traffic. This system requires that we pave those roads and also the parking lots where the food is stored and sold (grocery stores, food manufacturing plants, restaurants). Roadways are required for this system to make it possible for consumers to travel, park and purchase their food. All of these requirements deplete several of our valuable natural resources of air, soil, water, wildlife and energy. The
personal energy that the consumer receives from food produced in this way is
vastly less than the planetary and human energy used to produce it.
As a result of this resource-depleting imbalance, human health is depleted as
well, which is evident in America’s global leadership in disease and birth
defects. When
an individual grows their own food on a small plot of land, the impact on air,
soil, water, wildlife and energy is mitigated and the process can quickly
restore land that has been previously depleted. For much of the year, food can
be eaten fresh, the same day it is harvested, providing far superior energy and
health benefits than the current conventional food system that delivers food
that is already well into the deterioration process, which begins as soon as
food is harvested. The planetary
and personal energy expended to produce this food is in balance with the energy
provided from the food.
The same imbalance can be demonstrated with many elements of our current
lifestyle. The amount of planetary
energy and resources consumed to provide a small personal benefit is severely
incongruent and is reflected in ecological footprint analyses that show
Americans’ typical lifestyle can only be sustained into perpetuity by having
access to the resources of five to nine or more planets equal to Earth (based on
footprint analyses).
13. How can total “Green” living at a personal level change things around the world and in this Country? Answer: We believe that
sustainable living at a personal level is the only
way meaningful change can happen in the country and around the world. In the
same way that a picture consists of thousands or millions of tiny pixels, so is
the picture of our American lifestyle created by millions of individual
families’ lifestyles.
As individuals and individual families become aware of the lifestyle changes
that will truly move them closer to infinitely sustainable living, they will
automatically involve themselves in a better and more harmonious relationship
with the planet and themselves.
The results of significant numbers of individuals doing that will
change our social interactions and decisions at every level. This was demonstrated very clearly in the 80’s when New
York discovered that by cleaning up graffiti, the crime rate dropped in the
cleaned up areas. That happened
because people’s relationships with their environment changed.
Instead of relating to it as worth less (and relating to
themselves in the same way, by default), they began relating to their
environment and themselves as worth more.
As a result local individuals spontaneously began voluntarily
cleaning up their private property a little more.
They spontaneously joined others and formed local groups that began
reclaiming and cleaning up run down abandoned areas.
Local residents began uniting in power, again spontaneously, against gang
activity rather than continuing to feel powerless in relationship to their
environment and their experiences. The totally unexpected reduction in crime and
the impact in the social interaction of the neighborhoods where graffiti was
regularly removed was so significant that every major city in America now cleans
up their graffiti regularly to create that same result.
Years of governmental initiatives and policing activity failed to
accomplish what a few individuals accomplished within months as a result of
experiencing a better relationship with their environment and themselves. In those severely run down New York ghettos a few of the
human “pixels” subtly changed their relationships with the local environment
and significant areas of the picture of American life changed as a result.
The data was published and shared in reports and conferences.
As they learned about the results, other major cities quickly began following the model.
In a very short time the overall “picture” of American life as it
relates to crime rates, neighborhood social structure, and ghetto area
conditions and economics changed significantly. We are applying the same principal with our plan. The viral potential of individuals changing their relationship with their environment and themselves is huge. This kind of change is faster and more effective that legislation or attempts to control large scale social behavior. The viral change that is individually propelled is what is needed worldwide in the effort to create a large scale change to sustainable living. It is what we believe we are creating by involving people in the actual demonstrations of various versions of sustainable lifestyles. Back to Top
14. Why should I learn more about this project? Answer: Much has been done to demonstrate people’s willingness to engage in this movement. The global Transition Towns movement (began in Ireland in 2005) has rapidly expanded to over 110 towns worldwide that are currently participating. These Transition Towns are committed to beginning the transition to sustainable lifestyles.
They are focusing on reducing dependence on fossil fuels by doing things
like encouraging food production locally. They
are aware that their ability to make city-wide changes rapidly is limited and so
they are focusing on encouraging Transition lifestyles.
Locally, Boulder, Colorado is one of the Transition Towns (the first in
the U.S.).
Globally, people are engaged in a search that guides their decision
making. We are easily able to gauge what they are searching for by monitoring
consumer trends and purchasing behaviors. Trends in America show that there is
an increased interest in healthy and sustainable living.
This is demonstrated with the increased consumer activity and successful
businesses developed around “Green” and “Sustainable” projects. The sale
of seeds has increased substantially. Community Supported Agriculture ventures
(cooperatives that provide locally, organically grown seasonal produce) have
more membership applications for participation than they have room for members.
Large scale purchasing decisions indicate that people are searching for
healthier food, healthier shelter designs, healthier and cleaner energy sources.
Our project goes above and beyond what is currently available to the
consumer. We offer a life-style demonstration that includes healthy living
shelters, clean energy, healthy food, healthy economics, and healthy social and
family relationships. For the consumer engaged in a search of a healthy
sustainable life-style, Colorado Kin Domain’s offers the ultimate opportunity
to fully embrace that life-style taking it all the way to infinitely
sustainable.
In addition to the movements mentioned above, the current state of the
economy has stimulated a widespread awareness of the insecurities inherent in
our current lifestyle. The Global
Transition movement has defined an imminent triple crisis of climate change,
energy depletion, and the global economy. Our
modern lifestyle is bringing each of those to a rapid crisis point that will
require major adjustment on the part of every individual.
The production and delivery system for our food is completely entangled
with every one of those crisis points.
The current average American lifestyle affords people little
opportunity to create solutions for these problems until they are so pressing
that they demand attention. Even
though many people are becoming aware of the need to make lifestyle changes in
order to provide our descendents with a healthy planet, few people have the time
or energy to figure out how that can happen.
They are especially challenged to find how they personally can make a
change that will help anything. We fill that need by providing demonstrations of solutions that can be
embraced fully in one of our settlements or can be incorporated partially and
gradually wherever one lives, as the individual adjusts to the overall changing picture of the
lifestyle of America.
Many people who have embraced the mission of the Transition Towns will be
ready to move directly to the end goal rather than a transition goal.
Many who are already aware that they must expend tremendous amounts of
energy to secure a naturally healthy lifestyle, will find our demonstration
settlements and our public outreach goals very attractive.
Many who would like to live fully sustainably but are currently prevented
in doing so by enforced local restrictions and grid requirements will find our
settlements and our goals very inviting. Many
whose lives feel isolated and disconnected from others will sense the potential
for connection to nature, neighbors, family and self that our model will foster.
Many who struggle financially will be very attracted to a simple and yet
beautiful lifestyle that can replace the rat race lifestyle of working for too
little income to provide too little benefit.
CSA’s alone are very profitable. According
to Joe Kovach, head of Ohio State University’s IPM program, a carefully
designed polyculture ( a system in which a combination of multiple plants share
space), grown on small farms or even in suburban yards, could self-limit pest
problems and gross up to $90,000 per acre.
These kinds of models will be very attractive to many in today’s
economic climate.
The economy has driven many to
the extent of having to find or train in new career fields.
Our plan provides tremendous opportunity and motivation for those
individuals allowing them to become part of an industry that MUST be the
industry of the future as we restore our lifestyles to one-planet
sustainability.
Settlement
members will still live individually in our settlements and city domains in that
they will be the sole owner and caretaker of a 2.5acre plot of land (or less in
some city demonstrations) and their dwelling. They have dominion of and privacy
within their space. Members are invited to participate in the organically formed
“community” as much as they are interested in doing so (just as is the case
where most people already live).
Many people would prefer choosing to participate in a neighborly
community than feel an enforced isolation, which is a common experience in
modern lifestyles. People often
(perhaps typically) feel separate and isolated by the pressures and structures
of our modern lifestyle. We don’t generally know our neighbors well beyond one
or two. We ride buses to work with
strangers or drive to work alone or with a co-worker.
We shop amongst strangers. Our
children’s friends at school and their families are often strangers to us.
Strangers generally provide our services.
We interact with strangers and equipment (computers and telephones) more
than we interact with friends and family. This
creates stress levels that impact health and enjoyment of life.
We address this with one aspect of our research that will be
conducted and published about our members’ health.
Several physical elements will be tested at the time of entering the
settlement and periodically throughout the phases of the project (blood test,
blood pressure, heart strength, cholesterol, vision acuity, reflex response,
strength, flexibility, endurance, etc). Changes (we expect them to be positive)
will be publicly posted on our website and through articles, presentations and
publicity releases. Additionally,
the public will be invited to work, and learn with us through internships, work
exchange and how-to workshops that we offer.
Back to Top
15. Explain 10 ways we are stealing from our future for today’s needs? Answer:
To steal is to take something without the proper owners consent or
knowledge. The future generation is the proper owner of the resources they will
need to thrive and lead healthy, happy and productive lives. As we create
deficits in these resources, we are taking what rightfully belongs to our
children and all our future descendents. If we were able to have full consenting
conversation with our children, where we explained the consequences to their
future from our current life-styles, we are assuming that consent would not be
granted. We are assuming that our children want the necessary resources to lead
healthy, productive and happy lives. 1.
We are stealing soil nutrients from ours and our children's future.
Our current farming practices within the United States require more
nitrogen from the land than can be replenished before the field is planted and
farmed once again. As a result, synthetic nitrogen has been produced and used to
force continued production. (2008, Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners
Associations). There are numerous other micronutrients that have already
been completely depleted from much of the soil currently farmed, such as
selenium, zinc and flourine. The
loss of the micronutrients and micro-organisms that produce many of those
nutrients has resulted in what is called, “The Hidden Hunger,” referring to
physical deficiencies of nutrients, as food grown without these elements fail to
provide our bodies with their optimal needs for health and well-being.
This situation is the result of our chemically based and commercial
farming methods worldwide that are operating against or in conflict with
nature.
In addition to micro nutrients, our food has dropped drastically in other
nutritional values. In a review of
1963 and 1975 versions of the food tables it was clear that the nutrient value
of many foods had dropped, some drastically.
The vitamin C in sweet peppers has plummeted from 128 mg to 89 mg.
Vitamin A in apples has dropped from 90mg to 53mg.
According to nutritionist Alex Jack, writing for Life Extension Magazine,
the National Academy of Sciences has issued an alert that it takes twice as many
vegetables to get the daily requirement of vitamin A as previously thought. Nearly half the calcium and vitamin A in broccoli has
disappeared. The vitamin A content
of collard greens has dropped from 6500IU to 3800IU. Their potassium has dropped from 400mg to 179 mg.
Magnesium had fallen sharply from 57mg to 9mg.
Cauliflower has lost almost half its vitamin C, along with its thiamin
and riboflavin. The calcium in raw pineapple has dropped from 17mg to 7mg.
The list goes on and on.
According to Michael Karr, Ph.D., ARCPACS Certified Professional Soil
Scientist, throughout the U.S. human accelerated depletion is caused by the
production of high yield crops and concentrated livestock grazing.
Those activities cause nutrients to be removed and organic matter to be
depleted from the soil’s natural cycling system. Moreover, when commercial growers attempt to replenish the
soils of only some mineral nutrients by fertilization they may exacerbate
mineral nutrient imbalances. While
methods exist to replenish the soil of its mineral nutrients there is a relative
lack of knowledge on how to identify all deficiencies and to fully correct them
and how to correct them in the proper natural balance. In addition, the lack of an economic incentive to implement
long term, soil building solutions perpetuates the relative fragility and
inconsistency of US soils’ nutrient supplying power. 2. We are stealing our own and our
children’s ability to have a healthy large scale eco-system.
Our wholesale destruction of forests and natural habitat in exchange for
farmland and development, without attention given to developing and farming within
the function of the eco-system, has stolen this precious resource.
Our plan is to provide a model that demonstrates a lifestyle, which
functions within the existing ecosystem and supports nature in re-creating the
lost resources of forest and habitat. It
is our intention to provide models that will allow individual families (pixels
of the American lifestyle picture) to easily incorporate this change to the
degree that their readiness allows and to speed up their readiness process
through education and exposure.
If we continue to make demands of the soil without meeting the soil’s
needs for a natural process of replenishment, we will have to create more and
more farm lands to fill the nutritional needs of our world population, thereby
destroying ever more ecosystems. The amount of land available is finite. As more
land is converted from it’s natural state to agribusiness food production (as
it must do within our modern lifestyles), we change the natural habitat of the
area. Disruption of wildlife depletes a necessary component of a healthy
balanced eco-system necessary to sustain microorganisms and therefore human
life. 3.
We are stealing the oil and its
planetary benefits from our future.
In
doing so we are teaching our children they are wise to live on a daily basis of
consumption without thought to long-term consequences.
We are demonstrating to them that today’s money is a higher priority
than quality living for our future. We
are demonstrating that exploitation of resources is justified simply because we
want it rather than exploring the long-term effects on the planet and therefore
the future residents.
In south central Arizona the land subsidence (dropping of land level) was
first noticed in 1940. Since then,
that land has been measured as dropping 12.5 feet as a result of removing the
ground water. Although there is
little information about the results of removing massive amounts of oil from the
earth, creating similar huge underground cavities by removing oil would likely
create similar results. In Florida
and Louisiana they have experienced a different result. There, the consequences of removing excessive ground water
has resulted in salt water entering the aquifers according to the United States
Geological services. Again, the
removal of massive quantities of oil MUST have similar consequences.
The recent entry of sea water into aquifers will likely have other
consequences to the land and residents (desertification?) that we have not yet
experienced far enough into the cycle to understand.
There is controversy as to whether or not we have passed the point of
“Peak Oil”. Assuming that from this point forward, the supply of oil is less
available than it has ever been, it would make sense to change our life-styles
to reduce the amount of fossil fuels consumed on a daily basis. However, as the
population grows our life-style continues to consume ever greater amounts of
fossil fuels than 10 years ago, potentially stealing even more of the quality of
life from our descendents and the rest of nature’s inhabitants. 4.
We are stealing the forest from our
children.
The primary material used in housing construction is wood. There are
businesses that use “sustainable” practices of wood harvesting. However, a
tree must typically grow for about 20 years before it is the necessary size to
yield the desired quality and strength of wood for timber harvesting process. We
currently use more wood products in our daily lives than can be replenished in
twenty years. The U.S. reportedly only retains 4% of its old growth forest. Most
of this forest is designated as National Forest, which is open to commercial
logging (Sierra Club).
95% of Southern Australia’s natural woodlands have been cleared for
wheat farming according to a book called, Sustaining Life, How Human Health
Depends on Biodiversity.
The amount of natural forests that have been removed across the U.S. and
the world to support our modern lifestyle is devastating. But even worse is the number of trees and forests that are
being destroyed by invasive insects and diseases.
According to The Nature Conservancy these invaders are removing entire
species of trees from our forests and neighborhoods. For example, the emerald ash borer has laid bare huge
sections of suburban streets in Michigan, Ohio and Indiana, now moving into
Illinois and Wisconsin. Sudden Oak
Death has killed over one million trees in California.
In Colorado one can drive for miles and miles in many areas throughout
the state and see only hundreds of acres of dead pine trees as far as the eye
can see, the result of the pine beetle.
Our modern lifestyle has so severely disturbed the ecological balance
that, just like our food produce has lost significant amounts of nutrients, our
trees that are grown from the same depleted soils, water and air, are also not
living their optimal health. As a
result they are very susceptible to pathogens and insects whose natural role is
to break down weak and unhealthy trees and tissues in the environment so they
can be returned to the carbon cycle. The
process allows the strongest trees to survive and procreate, ensuring the best
continuation of the species. In our
forests we have harvested the strongest trees for our lifestyle products,
leaving forests full of weaker susceptible trees. In our yards we have planted our trees in depleted soil,
surrounding them with polluted air and feeding them with treated water and
man-made chemicals. They are weak
and susceptible as a result.
We have stolen a huge resource of strong forests and city trees from our
future that are a critically important element to the processes of cleaning our
air, filtering our water, and restoring our soil.
5.
We are stealing clean land from our
children.
Our current level of waste production produces huge toxic areas that will
take many generations to be restored to healthy land.
As we produce more waste than these sites and the ocean can accommodate,
more sites must be designated. A
quick review of states’ reports on available capacity in their existing
landfills reads as follows: one state reports 0-5 years of capacity, nine report
6-10 years capacity, seven report 11-15 years capacity, two report 16-20 years,
five report 20+ years, four report 30+ years, two report 40+ years, three report
50+ years, and one reports 500+ years. As
might be expected, the most densely populated areas of the eastern United States
have the least remaining capacity and, in fact, some of those states are
currently shipping their waste out to nearby states with more capacity (which
will cause theirs to fill faster). These
landfills can be reclaimed to some degree but use is very limited as they
contain huge amounts of toxic elements. The toxic elements are being contained but the containment
mechanisms (1/10 of an inch of plastic) may reasonably be expected to eventually
fail, at least in some of the thousands of landfills if not most.
Our future descendents will have to deal with this massive toxic legacy
that we are leaving them and will not have safe and life-supporting access to
these lands.
The desertification of large areas of land along with the simultaneous
draining of huge aquifers contributes substantially to the stealing of land from
our future generations. 6.
We are stealing family connections and
stability from our children.
There are many single parent families as well as its close cousin,
families where both parents work. As a result children’s education, and social
experiences are in the care of other adults who are inherently less invested in
the child’s best interest than a parent. Children become less connected and
committed to their families and more mobile, changing where they live according
to where they can find work. According to attachment studies by Bowlby and
Ainsworth, children who are raised with absent parents allow their peers and the
media to organize their thoughts and habits.
Children with a secure attachment to their caregiver are able to have
self confidence and approach crisis situations effectively with the ability to
seek cooperation in doing so.
Longitudinal studies were conducted in order to determine that as adults,
the children with a secure attachment are observed to be able to form trusting
relationships, have a positive self concept, to be comfortable sharing feelings
with friends and partners and were able to work cooperatively with others.
Children and adults who had multiple caregivers in childhood and lacked a
secure attachment, are more likely to be withdrawn, depressed in adulthood, use
attack in response to a crisis, and have difficulty maintaining positive
relationships. This situation is a
direct result of our modern unsustainable lifestyle. The negative effects of
this are demonstrated in schools and families throughout our society.
7.
We are stealing water from our children.
Many rivers that used to flow all the way to the ocean now peter out in
route. Some areas of the country are so over populated that water is channeled
from thousands of miles away to supply the life-style of the population. In
these same areas, water conservation is lacking. Golf courses, high water flush
toilets, swimming pools, high maintenance landscaping and agricultural field
flooding are commonplace. There is a finite amount of water, which is being
contaminated and managed in ways that make it unavailable and unhealthy for use.
Most adults can remember safely being able to drink from streams, rivers
and lakes. Now we are warned that
most water contains toxins from herbicide and pesticide farm and city runoff,
jet fuel additives, and other chemicals from household cleaning items.
Many people now warn their children to only drink filtered water.
The EPA lists the current known and measured contaminants in drinking
water. Naturally occurring
microorganisms in the water are known to cause diarrhea, vomiting and cramps in
some people. The chemicals added to
water in order to make it “safe for drinking” are known to cause cancer,
nervous system defects, and kidney and liver problems in some people.
Various regions of the United States have experienced severe drops in
their available water table over the last 70 years.
In Louisiana, the amount of groundwater being pumped has increased
tenfold since 1930. Ground water
levels have dropped over 200 feet. As
a result, salt water from the Gulf of Mexico has seeped into several aquifers.
(USGS Fact Sheet from 11/2003)
Ground water in the Tampa, Florida area has been depleted to the point
that saltwater has intruded on fresh water sources. Land subsidence (from a
lowered water table) has resulted in sinkholes leaving aquifers vulnerable to
street water runoff. Tampa now uses a desalination process to treat seawater and
salty aquifer water for its city water supply.
In Texas, increased population and water demands have resulted in
declines in the water level of over 400 feet. Land subsidence (land level
dropping) of up to 10 feet has been measured, increasing the risk of flash
flooding to those areas.
South Central Arizona has seen land subsidence of 12.5 feet and ground
water level declines of 300-500 feet. Streamside plant and animal life has been
lost as a result of reduced water levels.
The infinitely sustainable life-style is one that replenishes and
recharges natural resources such as water through harvesting of precipitation,
water re-use systems, constructed wet-lands, restoring indigenous forestation,
and planting plants acclimated to naturally occurring local water supply. 8.
We are stealing animal diversity and populations form our children.
Humans have increased the rate of extinction to plants and animals at a
rate 10,000 times greater than pre-human levels (Sustaining Life: How Human
Health Depends on Biodiversity). According
to the New Scientist (May 2006), there are 16,119 animal and plant species that
are currently in danger of extinction. It is estimated that 1 in 4 mammals, 1 in
8 birds and 1 in 3 amphibian species are at risk (similar to human cancer
rates). 784 known species have been declared extinct since records have begun
tracking the process. While species have a background extinction rate due to
evolution and change, the current rate of extinction far exceeds this background
rate. Industrial agriculture, deforestation, water pollution, urban sprawl, and
climate change all are credited with much of the changes in animal habitat that
have led to the reduction in number of species and in the populations of
species.
Like ripples in water, our human actions have far reaching effects that
we are just now becoming aware of. As
one species is threatened or goes extinct, it affects the balance and health of
another species that depends on that first species for its existence. 9.
We are stealing health, life and happiness
from our children.
In the early 1900’s, before chlorine, pesticides, herbicides and the
tens of thousands of other chemicals that we are exposed to, the average person
had a 1 in 50 chance of getting cancer. Today,
1 in 3 can expect to get cancer in their lifetime and one out of every 2 men.
(From HealthyNewAge.com) Add to
that the dramatic increases in heart disease, diabetes, auto-immune disorders
and one sees a clear image of a legacy of ill health and diminished opportunity
to live, that surely cannot make anyone happy – neither the givers of the
legacy, nor the receivers. Examples
of diminished health, life and happiness are everywhere. Health in America falls far below the averages in many
countries in spite of our medical advances, and arguably because of our modern
lifestyle (refer to other answers throughout this document). As a result of our modern lifestyle, overweight and obesity
in Americans and their children are epidemic.
The reduced health and shortened life span associated with that is well
known.
To become aware of the general unhappiness that our modern
lifestyle is providing for our children and grandchildren, one only needs to
look at the divorce rate statistics, or the substance abuse statistics, or the
childhood suicide statistics (the U.S. has the highest rate of homicide and
suicide in children of any industrialized country [per US Gov. Mortality and
Morbidity Weekly Report, 2/7/97]), or the welfare/poverty statistics, or the
high school violence statistics, and on and on.
How could it be otherwise when families typically feel obligated to have
both parents working in order to support the “minimally acceptable life?”
Very few American children have access to anything that could be called
the “good life” if that is defined as: having at least one parent home to
guide and care for the children, having sufficient family income, feeling safe
in neighborhoods and schools, being adequately prepared for a responsible happy
adulthood, and expecting to inherit a reasonably healthy planet with its full
complement of life sustaining resources to be available to them and their
children and grandchildren. 10. We are stealing our ocean quality from our
children.
Sixty percent of the world’s population lives on or near the coast with
most people living within 200 miles of the ocean. The ocean is a source of food,
transportation, and entertainment. More importantly, it covers 72% of the
earth’s surface and strongly effects air and water quality throughout the land
as well as the climate we experience. (Environmental Health Perspective, 2004).
The quality and health of the ocean is being depleted by our current
lifestyle. Contamination of any planetary water reservoir will end up being
contamination of all water to some degree through run-off water and sink holes
where surface water interfaces with ocean water (refer to USGS water quality
information above.) The ocean’s health and well-being is negatively effected
by off shore drilling, oil spills, commercial shrimp farms, industrial fishing
and cruise ship pollution (According to oceana.org). Plant and animal life of
the oceans are threatened and going extinct as a result of human activity and
it’s effect on ocean health (Sustaining Life: How Human health Depends on
Biodiversity).
According to a Canadian publication, Times Colonist, April 2009 reports that oxygen deprivation of the oceans are
of great concern. As algae are receiving overloads of chemical fertilizers from
run-off sources, the algae “blooms”, or grows prolifically at an astounding
rate. As the algae spreads, it blocks light from plants that are deeper in the
ocean. These plants are unable to produce oxygen due to the lack of
photosynthesis. The lack of oxygen then deprives oxygen dependent marine life of
the necessary components of life. We end up with massive deaths of entire
schools of fish as a result.
In addition to the above 10 ways we are stealing from our future,
there are the concerns of carbon emissions collecting in our
atmosphere, filtering some of the historic range of sun rays as well as
destroying ozone filters in other areas allowing an increased range of sun rays
to enter the earth’s surface. Back to Top
16. How can you reuse your recycling in your Domain? Answer:
One of the primary goals in our settlement is to reduce waste to zero. We
are approaching this from two directions. 1)
With
the goal of primarily bringing things to the land, which can be reabsorbed by
the land in a beneficial and timely manner and, 2)
Putting
our efforts and mind power toward creating ways to creatively, beautifully and
beneficially recycle the no-longer serviceable products.
We have a commitment to recycle everything.
Our short term goal is that no waste will be taken to landfills, only
recycling centers. In serving these
goals at Ark Conservation Ranch we will use adobe, cob, rammed earth, and clay
for construction materials. We will use a straw/clay mixture for insulation as
well as other natural locally grown plant products. We will use terra cotta for
our roofs. Porcelain, ceramic, and wood will help create our belongings. Any new
clothing will be made of natural fibers. We will make more and more of our own
products from resources on the land thereby reducing the production of waste
inside and outside our settlements that would require special handling to
return beneficially to the earth. The
products that we sell will be packaged in earth friendly packaging.
Most essential materials can be re-used and recycled.
For example, old clothing will become a quilt, other clothing, etc. Old
sheets become garden row covers. Broken tiles can be pulverized and used for
drainage areas, construction materials or landscaping amendments.
Some materials such as un-galvanized steel and glass may continue to be
part of our life-style initially. We plan to re-use these items. Creating a system to reheat them to melt them and reform them
into new uses may be possible. Some of these items may be returned to the earth.
In the transition stages we will necessarily have interaction with
products that will need commercially recycled such as paper, plastics, glass and
aluminum. Moving toward infinite
sustainability, it is our intention, within five years of the initiation of the
project, to have the demonstration settlements and demonstration city domain
free of any items that cannot be re-used, recycled or safely returned to the
earth on the private domains. Back to Top
17. When you say “Attractive settlements” what will make them attractive? Answer:
Each member agrees to beautify and care for the land using paths, plants,
trees, flowers and ponds. Living fences will be planted to mark borders rather
than metal or harvested wood fences. Reforestation
and a-forestation consistent with the area’s naturally occurring flora and
fauna will be a part of each domain’s activity both in our settlement
demonstrations and in our city domain demonstrations. Virtually all of nature is
beautiful and these settlements will preserve that naturally occurring beauty in
our choice of landscaping, construction styles and methods.
The settlement will be free of power lines.
All sources of energy will be visually and audibly contained within each
family’s 2.5 acre Kin Domain.
Structures will be made of materials that are congruent with the natural
material of the area harvested in harmony with natural life cycles and eco-system
health. The structures will be
designed for beauty, harmony and comfort. Public zones will be stewarded for
health of local nature and beauty throughout every phase of the project.
Even during construction, the areas and materials will be carefully
stored and organized. The settlement will be largely free of collectively generated
noise pollution, visual pollution, light pollution and air pollution.
It is our understanding of human nature that changing to a lifestyle that
is perceived as “less than” will not be effective.
Our collective estimation of “less than” is closely related to what
we perceive as attractive. Our
sustainable lifestyles demonstrations will attract people if they are
attractive. That has been and will
continue to be one of our priorities as we construct these demonstrations. Back to Top
18. How exactly is our current lifestyle destroying the quality of our lives? Answer:
Our modern life-styles have made sense for the society into which we have been raised and
the life-style options we have been aware of. At the same time, we have begun to
question whether this is the life-style we want to perpetuate for our
descendents and the future well-being of the planet’s other populations.
We work over 40
hours of our week to earn money to support our living. Many spend up to an hour
a day in commute to and from work (March 2005 Census Bureau Statistics).
If we are among the fortunate few, we enjoy how we spend our work day and
feel we have a meaningful contribution to the world. The reality of the current
lifestyle is that there are many more menial jobs that have to be filled in
order to keep the cogs moving than there are deeply satisfying jobs. So, more
than one half of our average waking day
is
spent working at something that may have little meaning to us in exchange for
money.
Because most
people’s minds work in a continuous sort of manner, they are unable to
immediately shut off the thoughts pertaining to work. As such, even as they are
lying down to sleep at night, they are working at resolving issues that have
come up at the work place. On
average, another three hours a day is spent on obtaining food, preparing food
and cleaning up after eating. Most US citizens spend at least three hours a day
watching TV or on the computer (keeping them indoors, inactive and further
disengaged from real people and nature). An
hour or so is spent on preparation for work and organization preparing to leave
the home for the majority of the day. All of this adds up to very little time,
perhaps an hour if a person is fortunate, to spend time in true
connection with their family, nature or themselves.
Some of those
jobs people devote their life to
are toxic in nature. The
people performing them are exposed to radiation, toxic chemicals, high intensity
electro magnetic waves, exhaust fumes etc. If we work full-time, we have health
care that helps mitigate the costs that are inherent in participating in jobs
and stress that create illness in the body. Many of us pay up to 35% (December
2007, Bureau of Labor and Statistics) of those costs out of our wages. The
quality of care that we get is limited to the number of patients that doctors
are trying to serve while maintaining their income, standard of living and pay
their mal-practice insurance.
We may be
renting or paying a mortgage for our living space. Up to one third, (and
sometimes more for lower incomes and renters) of our income is spent paying for
that living space. As the economy changes, companies down size or move out of
the country, many jobs are lost. Then paying that monthly living space and
lifestyle cost becomes very challenging, and for some, impossible without going
further into debt. Currently many homeowners are having to Short-Sale, or go
through foreclosure due to the current state of the economy.
A local realtor in Denver reports that 4 out of 5 homes he lists and
sells currently are being sold as “short sales” in an effort to avoid
foreclosure.
In the
meantime, if we have children, and are working full-time, we have our children
in child-care or public schools. Child-care facilities are working toward
providing the best care and most stimulating environment possible, yet can in no
way compare the quality of care of an attentive parent (per Bowlby and Ainsworth
research on Attachment). Schools are working to develop the best curriculum and
ways to measure success in order to justify their continued funding (No Child
Left Behind). Yet, the United States tests scores continue to pale in comparison
to other countries such as Japan and Korea (Feburary 2005, Access My Library).
An April 2001 study reported by the Journal of American Medical Association
indicates that 30% of children are involved in school “violence” (bullying).
A 2008 report with WellShpere indicates that “…160,000 children in the United States miss school each day as a
result of being bullied.” The
level of anxiety shown in children in public schools in comparison to before
entering school is a significant health concern for our children. (August 2006,
University of Michigan Health System).
In order to
provide our children with stimulating social skills outside of school, since
much of social and play (natural learning) time has been curtailed in public
schools, we support their involvement in sports and after school activities
(January 2009, Reuters). The pressure to watch significant amounts of TV is huge
for both parents and children. This
has negative health effects as well. The
amount of quality time we have to spend with our children and family members has
been reduced to minutes per day and much of that is spent dealing with the
problems and negative results created by the events of the rest of the day.
The average
level of stress that is experienced in the current modern life-style as a result of
time and economic pressures is enormous for the majority of people. Not only do
we spend worry on today’s routine, but we worry about having enough money for
retirement, for our children’s continued education, and what we will be able
to pass on to our children for the future.
Much of the
current life-style is based on a consumption/depletion system as indicated in
the above answer about the 10 ways we are stealing from our
future. In the end, it adds up to depletion in the quality of life for everyone
with collective experiences like increased violence, crime, illness, need for
“vegetating time,” and withdrawal from each other and natural relationships
with nature and its cycles. Back to Top
19. Is this going to be a religious group? Is this practice coming from any religious basis? Answer:
There is no religious basis or absence there of in the life-style that we
are creating. While any particular way of believing can become a religion for a
particular person, we encourage each individual to find the right relationships
in their life for themselves through their own experience and experimentation.
Our vision pertains to a practical approach to creating health for humans,
society and nature. Back to Top
Answer:
We
are designing a method and guide for growing a fund that
will be used to fund another settlement in their start-up.
We have budgeted for professional consultation on designing how
that fund will be developed and sustained. In exchange for financial, procedural and physical
assistance in starting up their settlement, each settlement will agree to accept
responsibility to apply this method of growing a fund in their settlement.
By the time the fund is sufficient to start another settlement the
funding group will have built their own settlement and will be responsible to
provide training and labor assistance to the new group as well, substantially
reducing the amount of money needed to start each new settlement.
We’ve already
experienced the beginnings of part of this process.
We’ve spent seven months preparing our plan and reaching a level of
readiness to immediately proceed to building the first settlement and
implementing the plan. During that
process, we have produced the first draft of our guide for other groups to make
the process easier and simpler for them. That
guide has been shared with the two groups that may be our test groups and they
are following the guide. In a
single month the group that has applied that guide has accomplished more than we
did in four months. The guide has already saved them a significant amount of money,
time and effort. It has helped them
organize and mobilize quickly and has brought the group members together as a
highly productive team. As each
group refines this process, this intended result will grow.
The amount of
labor and technical assistance we can offer to these first two groups is
somewhat limited simply because of the stage we will be in at the time they will
be ready for that. However, by the time Ark Conservation Ranch and each of the
test groups grows their regenerating funds they will each be ready to provide a
substantial amount of volunteer physical and technical assistance to another
group.
The new groups
will also be asked to agree to implement the funding model and the technical/physical
assistance model. It is our goal to refine this duplication process to the
point that it is possible for each settlement group to duplicate itself (help
another get started) every three to five years.
It is an optimistic goal but even at double that many years it would be a
tremendously valuable process. Some
of the guides that will help make this possible are already in outline and draft
form, and others will be completed as we implement our plan. Back to Top
21. How will this Domain living impact your children and the children of other people as well? Answer: Loving families and raising healthy children is one of the most beneficial outcomes of this life-style. In an infinitely sustainable settlement,
In addition to providing benefit to our own children, we are creating two educational curricula that will be available for children in the general public. The first is a home school curriculum (K-12) for any parent in or out of our settlements that wish to teach and rear their children more connected to nature and family.
The second is a
public school module to introduce the concept of infinitely sustainable
lifestyles to public school children at all age levels. This six week module can be included as part of several courses of study
and will be designed to introduce the concepts of infinite sustainability to the
students and reconnect the learner to nature by engaging them in
studies of relationships with elements in nature as part of exploring infinitely
sustainable lifestyles. We may also
be able to provide superior outdoor education modules for local fifth graders. Back to Top
Answer:
The settlement will develop a home school curriculum and infuse the
curriculum into daily living such that learning is an integral part of
settlement and domain life. They will have full-scale life opportunities to
practice and experiment with what they are learning and to explore cultural
expressions such as music, dance and theater. Children are understood to have
much to teach adults as well. We aspire to be good students of our children as
well as experienced guides of them. The founder of the settlement has home schooled four children and is trained as a certified public school teacher and a Montessori teacher. Other members are trained in child development and multiple fluent languages. We have international members who can be part of cultural awareness and provide living examples of global studies. There are many quality options for educating our children until we have developed a quality home school, nature based curriculum for them. Some parents may opt to send their children to a local public or private school. Some will opt to home school. Some are researching the possibility of starting an accredited school within the settlement and including the interested children in the design and decisions. Back to Top
23. How is building this community any different than building a residential homestead?
Answer:
Because we do
not understand your exact meaning that you refer to with the term
“homestead,” we begin with the following definition.
Homestead -
Homestead has
come to mean different things in different situations. Our project has
similarities to a homestead by the first definition but it also has significant
differences. In that definition the
homestead experience is about farming a family owned piece of land.
In our settlement we aren’t farming so much as gardening and even that
is quite different from most gardening done in modern lifestyles.
Our only activity that could be related to “farming” would be
community fields, greenhouses, and hydroponics units grown for the purpose of
demonstrating growing methods that result in produce for humans and animals that
is superior in both quality and quantity. Selling
that produce is the best way to get this awareness to the public.
It will also provide income for the residents who choose to engage in
that particular income generating activity.
Many will not
choose that activity but will grow their own food on their own domain and will
generate income in other ways, demonstrating other versions of infinitely
sustainable lifestyles. We are not creating a “back to the land” movement.
It is our desire and intention to create and demonstrate a variety of
important new lifestyles that we believe will be significantly valuable in
helping North Americans see and transition to a way of living that will allow us
as a society to more easily and quickly move into a level of sustainability that
will allow us and our future generations to live high quality lives into
perpetuity.
Regarding the
second definition: There are some important differences and similarities
between our plan and the Homesteading that took place in response to the
Homestead Act of 1862. This act was part of Manifest Destiny with the goal of
spreading the white population throughout the entire nation in order to
establish possession of the land through having a physical presence on the land.
As such, immigrants were offered “free land” in exchange for “settling”
the land for a period of 5 years after which time they would become the
“owner” and the land could not be sold from under them for any purpose. The
settler’s progress was overseen by government representatives.
We are similar
in that we wish to expand Americans’ experience into new territory.
We are doing so in a way that we believe will make it easier and more
enjoyable for people to expand their awareness and understanding of how to make
this critically important transition. The
primary difference in what we are doing and in that second definition of
homesteading is the paradigm or vision from which it is derived. Our founding
concept is that humans can live in a harmonious relationship with nature and as
a result nature will serve us in a better way. The way we approach creating this
lifestyle will look quite different than homesteading. Instead of our focus
being to make large fields of one crop, we will create individual gardens with a
multitude of plants. Instead of clearing land to be replanted with a desired
crop, we will be working with the plant life already present and enhancing
it’s health with our presence rather than diminishing it’s life. Rather than
reducing tree population, we will be adding trees.
We will collect important data that will help existing homeowners make
choices that will benefit their families and their communities far beyond a
single lifetime’s experience.
Creating these
settlements and the city domains is more about gardening (rejoice and delight
in; greek). Homesteading was historically more about farming (to hold
firm, fixed payment; latin). Back to Top
24. You mentioned "attractive settlements." Attractive for some people means looking the same, uniform style and/or color. Will sameness be part of the definition of beauty?Sameness and a kin's domain version of "covenant controls" is not part of our vision. We do intend to provide a variety of sustainable house designs to choose from for those who do not feel comfortable designing their own sustainable home, or for those who want to adapt the designs available. However, designing and getting county approval for your own design is always an option as well. We expect and encourage creative new ideas to fill our settlement. Any home design must meet the sustainability goals of the settlement and be able to removed fairly easily by future generations if they should want to do so.I would like to share the following note sent to us by a prospective resident. "My experience is that people perceive beauty differently. I had a neighbor who had an angel with a missing wing in his yard. Some people looked at it and saw the missing wing which looked like junk to them, others saw the angel and celebrated it as art. Also, "weeds" to some people are seen as an expression of natural beauty or even a source of nutritional food (like dandelions or flowering thistles), while to others it represents chaos."Our policy is that on your domain you are king and queen. You and you alone are responsible to your self and your future kin and will receive the fruits of your choices. We believe that the very substantial responsibility to organize and beautify our domains for the health and joy of our children and grandchildren (and perhaps even ourselves reborn) will be the only "covenant controls" needed or effective.Back to Top
25. Will the village wastes need to periodically be trucked to a sewage treatment plant outside the village? Are these hauling costs included in the budget?We are
committed to being fully responsible for our own waste and everything we bring
to our kin’s domains. As quickly
as possible we would like to meet the standard of taking NO waste to landfills
or treatment centers. In the
beginning we may carry some stuff to recycling centers but that is not a
sustainable activity and we want to wean ourselves from that ASAP.
This plan will require a lot of growth, both in responsibility and
creativity, to a level previously unreached in modern lifestyles.
The entire kin’s domain lifestyle will require that of us all. Back to Top
26. Will the village
wastes be somehow recycled or made into some productive use?
Back to Top
|
| host gatherings, | |
| provide some instruction, | |
| provide a selection of home building plans to choose from for those who do not want to design their own, | |
| group and mentor assistance in the designing process and building permit process and in the building process. |
Most residents will not be building only their own home. We will help each other get all the homes built. Again, this is a self-selection process. No assignments will be made to anyone. Each family will be responsible to create the relationships that will support their settling process.
A more detailed intake process will be published on this site as soon as it is ready. It is currently in progress.
Back to Top![]()
29. What are the policy/guidelines on eating animals in the village?
There
will be no such policy, guideline or rule in our settlement.
A couple of the other groups that are forming settlements have talked
about forbidding or strongly discouraging the eating of meat.
We are not inclined to fund such a plan for several reasons.
Although we are open to being convinced that this is part of Anastasia's
dream,
we have not found that rule or guideline on our own. We support everyone's
right to their own level of awareness and personal nutritional choices.
![]()
While this answer may sound abrupt,
those opposed to the idea of butchering livestock on their domain should make
every effort to not butcher livestock on their private domain.
Those who wish to manage and control the legal activities in the private
domains of others or even community areas of the settlement may not be happy in
our settlement and will likely self-select themselves into another group or
start one.
We are not willing to take on the responsibilities of any of our
settler’s personal judgments of others – We are each God’s children and as
such, have the ability to create and manage our own happiness without requiring that
others take on that responsibility for us.
![]()
We will allow no hunting on the settlement just like every city or town does for safety reasons. We have no control of the lands around the settlement and we have no desire to control our resident’s freedom to experience their own expansion of their own awareness at their own pace, in their own way. We wish to accept our personal ability and responsibility to create and grow into our own awareness of each member of our community as a gift from God given to us in Love and perfection as the fulfillment of our desire to create and live in Paradise.
Each family gets to accept their own responsibility for their own growth. If they wish to introduce traps or poisons to their kin’s domain land that both supports and nurtures them and their future kin, they will receive the growth experiences from that choice as their relationship with that land begins to diminish its ability to support and nurture their family. It is their right and their freedom if they have such a need in order to become conscious of their old programming so they can create a new program.
Back to Top![]()
In my book 5, page 114 (black cover edition)
there is no reference to the quote you mentioned.
However, let me ask this: “How
will the coyotes, wolves, wildcats, weasels, eagles, hawks, falcons, and the
myriad of other predators living in nature, affect people on their domains who
have ducks and birds (or even dogs and cats), and are trying to raise all
their animals together to be friends as well as vegetarians?"
That is a far more serious and meaningful question for each resident to answer for
himself.
We
will not consider the level of regulation that the previous several questions
seem to be seeking. If this
kind of regulation and filtering of people is necessary in order for you to feel
safe, comfortable or happy, you may want to consider staying in the city and creating a kin’s domain
there where this level of regulation is commonplace.
It’s not that you would not be welcome in our settlement, you
absolutely are. You are a child of
God. We are creating a new model of
living that would be described as living in Paradise. To that end we are looking for people who
are committed to grow into the full conscious awareness of and conscious
wielding of their divine nature as children of God, recognizing God in
everything including all other children of God.
We are looking
for people committed to explore and expand their conscious awareness of their
inherent nature as creators of their personal and even collective experience.
We are looking for pioneers who are ready to create heaven on Earth – a paradise of beauty and freedom, and individual responsibility to create those experiences that make heaven on Earth real for us. That means being willing to grow into the ability to take full responsibility for our inherent role in creating our experience, albeit unconsciously created until we bring that creative action to our conscious awareness. Is that you?
Back to Top![]()
33. What are the community creators’ self imposed requirements for maintaining water quality in the area.
This begs the question, "Who do you imagine these 'community creators' to be?" The community is created by the community members. There are no community creators who are accepting any self-imposed requirements for maintaining anything other than the community residents. If you have the idea that we are something like a kin's domain version of a covenant controlled turn-key community, that would be a misconception. We are a community of people wishing to be fully responsible for our experiences. Therefore, if you are a resident of our community, you would be the one responsible for maintaining any self imposed requirements you may have for water quality.
This is not a community like the one where most people currently live. We are not providing water as is done in the cities, with chemical treatments, sewage treatment plants, and electricity that mysteriously arrives to the fixtures and outlets of a home. The residents are responsible for these things. We are not designing a city system that supports the residents in continuing to live insulated from their personal responsibility for their life experiences and then point blame at another for any problems that arise as a result of their choices. Such a system cannot support the experience of Paradise, Eden, heaven on earth, or kin’s domain lifestyle experience as we have envisioned it for Ark Conservation Ranch.
If you wish to have control of the water quality, then you
might make an effort to put yourself in the position within our settlement of managing that.
Others may disagree with your system and will be free to devise their
own. Depending on where we
settle we may have well water, river water, reservoir water, county treated
water (that may need filtered) or spring water.
![]()
That will be up to each resident. We have been told by a team of scientists that whether there are cell phones or not, whether there is a cell phone tower on or near the property or not, there will still be roughly the same amount of radiations penetrating your body and home at all times. Those radiations are everywhere. If this is important to you, you may want to consider this when designing your type of home (for possible shielding while you are inside).
Back to Top![]()
35. Will
there be guns in the village? What are the conditions regarding weaponry in the
village?
We will not restrict guns. There
are those joining us who are hunters but there will be no hunting on our
settlement for the same reasons it is not legal to hunt in or near any other
cities or developments.
We are creating a settlement of kin’s domains, not a prison.
If we begin making rules that keep people out, the effect is that we
create a prison for ourselves. We
prefer to create a settlement of freedom to the degree that we are able. From that level we intend to continue to expand our ability
to manage and grow our freedoms.
We strongly
urge our prospective residents to not expect to come to a community that is done for
them, managed for them, regulated for them, and insulated from the outside world or from any
collection of “bad guys”. We
urge each resident to come as a child of God expecting to create the experience
of living and working in harmony and
respect with other children of God.
![]()
| To contact us by email click this link To contact our office by phone, call 303-374-1945 or 303-833-4982 |